Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Last Updated: 16.06.2025 03:50
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist
How might an Indian girl respond to someone saying "I love you"?
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
Why are perceived or real slights interpreted as rejections and reality by pwBPD?